The court providently exercised its discretion in imputing an annual income of $180,000 to defendant based upon his failure to provide documentation of his current income as required by the Uniform Rules for Trial Courts (22 NYCRR) § 202.16 [k]). The husband also admitted that he works part time as a lawyer and receives, in addition to cash payments, valuable goods and services as barter (see Gering v Tavano,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LeCRICHIA v. LeCRICHIA
4613, 311427/09, 4614.
82 A.D.3d 599 (2011)
920 N.Y.S.2d 40
VICTORIA ANNE WENZEL LeCRICHIA, Respondent, v. ANTHONY LeCRICHIA, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 24, 2011.
Decided March 24, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
