1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 16 N.Y.3d
  5. 16 N.Y.3d 801 (2011)
 

PEOPLE v. CORNELL

No. 119 SSM 61

16 N.Y.3d 801 (2011)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. BARAK CORNELL, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided March 24, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Foley , District Attorney, Mayville ( Lynn S. Schaffer of counsel), for appellant.

Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria LLP, Buffalo ( Timothy P. Murphy of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

A trial court has the constitutional duty to advise a defendant of the direct consequences of a guilty plea, including any period of postrelease supervision (PRS) that will be imposed as part of the sentence (see People v Catu, 4 N.Y.3d 242, 244-245 [2005]). "Although the court is not required to engage in any particular...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases