Supreme Court properly determined that appellants made a prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment as to plaintiff's claims of "significant limitation of use" of his cervical spine, lumbar spine, and right knee (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Appellants submitted competent and objective medical evidence that plaintiff did not suffer a loss of range of motion as to any of those organs or systems (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
TOWNES v. HARLEM GROUP, INC.
4576, 300449/08.
82 A.D.3d 583 (2011)
920 N.Y.S.2d 21
VICTOR L. TOWNES, Respondent, v. HARLEM GROUP, INC., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 22, 2011.
Decided March 22, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
