DAIMLERCHRYSLER INSURANCE COMPANY v. SECK

4575, 115218/08.

82 A.D.3d 581 (2011)

919 N.Y.S.2d 20

DAIMLERCHRYSLER INSURANCE COMPANY, as Subrogee of Chrysler Financial Co., Respondent, v. ALIOU SECK et al., Defendants, and NATIONWIDE ASSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided March 22, 2011.


An order striking an answer should be vacated where a defendant can show a reasonable excuse for default (CPLR 5015 [a]) and a meritorious defense (see Harwood v Chaliha, 291 A.D.2d 234 [2002]). Here, Nationwide demonstrated that its failure to oppose plaintiff's motion was neither willful, nor part of a pattern of dilatory behavior (see Chelli v Kelly Group, P.C., 

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases