1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 82 A.D.3d
  5. 82 A.D.3d 446 (2011)
 

KAMINSKY v. HERRICK, FEINSTEIN, LLP

4431, 602540/09.

82 A.D.3d 446 (2011)

917 N.Y.S.2d 866

EDWARD A. KAMINSKY, Appellant, v. HERRICK, FEINSTEIN, LLP, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided March 3, 2011.

The complaint was properly dismissed as barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Plaintiff's action arose out of the same set of circumstances as his prior 2006 action, which was dismissed (see 59 A.D.3d 1 [2008], lv denied 12 N.Y.3d 715 [2009]), and "once a claim is brought to a final conclusion, all other claims arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases