iv class="lgl-u-1 lgl-u-md-3-5 header-right">
Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
Sign in
 

NEUMANN v. VEGA

No. E049519.

MONICA VON NEUMANN, as Executrix, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHARLOTTE NELTON H. VEGA, Defendant; JOHN VEGA, Intervener and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

Filed November 4, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Younger Law Corp., Connie L. Younger; Holstein, Taylor & Unitt and Brian C. Unitt for Intervener and Appellant.

Peter K. Levine and Albert Gopin for Plaintiff and Respondent.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

OPINION

RICHLI, J.

In 1991, John Von Neumann obtained a default judgment against Charlotte Vega, declaring that he was not the father of her son, John Vega.1 (We will refer to John Von Neumann as Von Neumann, to John Vega as John, and to Charlotte Vega as Charlotte.) In 2009, John intervened in the long-dormant action and moved to set aside the default judgment. The trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases

    MATTER OF QUINCY B. | 82 A.D.3d 416 (2011) | 20110301302 | Leagle.com
     

    MATTER OF QUINCY B.

    4224.

    82 A.D.3d 416 (2011)

    917 N.Y.S.2d 629

    In the Matter of QUINCY B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

    Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

    Decided March 1, 2011.


    The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning identification and credibility. The victim testified that appellant personally seized his property, rather than appellant being merely present at the scene. The victim also testified that he recognized...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases