SNOLIS v. CLARE

2010-02773.

81 A.D.3d 926 (2011)

917 N.Y.S.2d 581

TARA SNOLIS et al., Appellants, v. TIMOTHY W. CLARE, Defendant, and WILLIAM J. POISSON, ESQ., Individually and as a Partner in POISSON & HACKETT, ESQS., et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided February 22, 2011.


Ordered that the order dated February 1, 2010, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs' cross motion for leave to renew their prior motion for summary judgment on their cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice insofar as asserted against the defendants William J. Poisson and Poisson & Hackett, Esqs. The motion was based on an expert's affidavit submitted for the first time. However, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases