1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 81 A.D.3d
  5. 81 A.D.3d 538 (2011)
 

PANATOZ INTERNATIONAL CORP. v. ROZEN

4314, 7526/05.

81 A.D.3d 538 (2011)

917 N.Y.S.2d 566

PANATOZ INTERNATIONAL CORP., Respondent, v. DAVID ROZEN et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided February 22, 2011.

Appellants' argument that the motion court lacked jurisdiction was not argued below and it is therefore unpreserved (see e.g. Honique Accessories, Ltd. v S.J. Stile Assoc., Ltd., 67 A.D.3d 481, 482 [2009]). Were we to review this argument, we would find it unavailing because the owners of the four parcels in question took ownership subject to a document that contemplated future court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases