BERGER v. HALE

2009-11503.

81 A.D.3d 766 (2011)

916 N.Y.S.2d 831

CHRISTINA G. BERGER et al., Respondents, v. THEODORE HALE et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided February 15, 2011.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant Theodore Hale established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by adducing expert opinion evidence that he did not deviate from the relevant standards of practice (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324 [1986]). In opposition, the plaintiffs submitted an affidavit of an expert which was sufficient to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases