The court properly denied Silverstein's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims. Issues of fact remain as to whether Silverstein created the allegedly dangerous condition existing thereon or had notice thereof (see Schneider v Kings Hwy. Hosp. Ctr.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MAK v. SILVERSTEIN PROPERTIES, INC.
81 A.D.3d 520 (2011)
916 N.Y.S.2d 592
RATHA MAK, Respondent, v. SILVERSTEIN PROPERTIES, INC., Respondent, and 120 BROADWAY HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant, et al., Defendants. RATHA MAK, Respondent, v. SILVERSTEIN PROPERTIES, INC., Appellant, and 120 BROADWAY HOLDINGS, LLC, Respondent, et al., Defendants. (And Other Actions.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 17, 2011.
Decided February 17, 2011.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.