In this personal injury action, plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for an order making a conditional discovery order absolute. We conclude that the motion was properly denied because the underlying conditional order did not provide a concrete directive capable of enforcement.
In June 2007, plaintiff served defendants with a 20-day supplemental notice for discovery and inspection. By dint of two conference orders, defendants were directed to respond...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
