Substantial evidence, namely the testimony of the complainant who was a passenger in petitioner's vehicle, supported the findings that petitioner exposed himself to the complainant and engaged in lewd behavior as he was driving and that these actions constituted violations of 35 RCNY 6-18(d)(2) and (i). There exists no basis to disturb the credibility determinations of the hearing officer (see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF BAUTISTA v. CITY OF NEW YORK
4236, 111576/09.
81 A.D.3d 472 (2011)
915 N.Y.S.2d 902
In the Matter of ANGEL BAUTISTA, Petitioner, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al. Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 10, 2011.
Decided February 10, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.