The motion was properly denied as defendants failed to proffer a reasonable excuse for the default or a meritorious defense to plaintiff's claim for an account stated (see CPLR 5015). Contrary to defendants' contention, the default judgment entered against them was not a nullity on the basis that plaintiff did not comply with CPLR 3215(g)(3). Although the affidavit of additional mailing referred to the mailing of a summons and verified complaint and the complaint itself...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
