Plaintiff was injured when he jumped from a stalled elevator allegedly at the direction of an employee of the subcontractor. While the record presents issues of fact whether the East 81st defendants had notice that the elevator was problematic and whether they violated their nondelegable duty to inspect the elevator, and whether Capital exercised supervisory control over the work site and had notice that the elevator was problematic (see Urban v No. 5 Times Sq. Dev., LLC...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
