The court considered the appropriate factors and properly exercised its discretion in denying resentencing. Given defendant's extensive criminal record, the serious infraction he committed while incarcerated and his history of absconding, the court properly concluded that substantial justice dictated denial of the motion (see e.g. People v Hidalgo,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ESTELA
4101, 720/04, 4336/04.
80 A.D.3d 526 (2011)
914 N.Y.S.2d 893
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LOUIS ESTELA, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 25, 2011.
Decided January 25, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.