Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in denying that branch of his motion which was to suppress the physical evidence seized from his person after his arrest on July 12, 2006, on the basis that the police officer lacked probable cause to arrest him. The police officer, an experienced and specially trained member of the Street Narcotics Enforcement Unit, testified at the suppression hearing that he observed the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
