The court properly assessed points under the risk factor for drug abuse, based on defendant's statements contained in his presentence report. In any event, even without that assessment, defendant would remain a level two offender, and we find no basis for a discretionary downward departure (see People v Mingo,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. DIAZ
3982, 3983, 6176/07.
80 A.D.3d 432 (2011)
913 N.Y.S.2d 555
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE DIAZ, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 4, 2011.
Decided January 4, 2011.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.