1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 79 A.D.3d
  5. 79 A.D.3d 595 (2010)
 

IN THE MATTER OF TIMOTHY M.

3921, 3922.

79 A.D.3d 595 (2010)

913 N.Y.S.2d 94

IN THE MATTER OF TIMOTHY M., Also Known as TIMOTHY B. and Another, Infants. TIMOTHY B., Appellant; EDWIN GOULD SERVICES FOR CHILDREN, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 21, 2010.

Clear and convincing evidence supports the finding that respondent did not meet the parental responsibility criteria set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 111 (1) (d). The evidence shows that respondent was incarcerated for a large portion of the children's lives, failed to provide financial support, and did not maintain regular contact with the children (see Matter of Aaron P., 61 A.D.3d 448

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases