The court correctly found that, based on the photographic evidence, the jury's apportionment of liability could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence (see Lolik v Big V Supermarkets,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.