1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 79 A.D.3d
  5. 79 A.D.3d 864 (2010)
 

MATTER OF CAROTHERS v. GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY

2009-08300.

79 A.D.3d 864 (2010)

914 N.Y.S.2d 199

In the Matter of ANDREW CAROTHERS, M.D., P.C., Appellant, v. GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided December 14, 2010.

Ordered that the order dated April 14, 2009, is affirmed, with costs.

The testimony of an employee of the company that handled the plaintiff's medical billing was insufficient to lay a foundation for the admission of the claim forms under the business records exception of the hearsay rule (see Art of Healing Medicine, P.C. v Travelers Home & Mar. Ins. Co., 55 A.D.3d 644 [2008]). Such records were inadmissible because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases