The determination of respondent's chief engineer (CE) denying petitioner's claim for additional compensation for disposing of an amount of petroleum-contaminated soil in excess of the contract amount was made without sound basis in reason and in disregard of the facts (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
A.F.C. ENTERPRISES, INC. v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY
3625, 117236/07.
79 A.D.3d 514 (2010)
913 N.Y.S.2d 75
A.F.C. ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 14, 2010.
Decided December 14, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
