Petitioner failed to offer any admissible evidence to refute the testimony of respondent's agents that violations had been issued only for those handbills affixed to City property. Thus, the Board's determination was supported by substantial evidence and must be confirmed. (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SMART WORKOUT, INC. v. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK
3860, 101073/10.
79 A.D.3d 492 (2010)
911 N.Y.S.2d 630
SMART WORKOUT, INC., Petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 9, 2010.
Decided December 9, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.