Defendants failed to assert a basis for vacating the April 17, 2008 order, which valued the property based on an average of three court-ordered appraisals and directed a sale despite outstanding unresolved collateral issues. In issuing the valuation order, the court did not ultimately exceed the authority granted to it by the parties to value the properties pursuant to the appraisals. That the valuation was based on three competing appraisals rather than two, does not violate...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
