1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 79 A.D.3d
  5. 79 A.D.3d 469 (2010)
 

PEOPLE v. ESCOBAR

3806, 3807, 3304/04, 27525/05, 3232/06.

79 A.D.3d 469 (2010)

912 N.Y.S.2d 202

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARIO ESCOBAR, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 7, 2010.

Defendant did not preserve any of his arguments for appellate review. It is well established that "[t]he word `objection' alone [is] insufficient to preserve [an] issue" for review as a question of law (People v Tevaha, 84 N.Y.2d 879, 881 [1994]). Defendant argues that this principle should not apply because the trial court prohibited "speaking objections" and instructed counsel to make unelaborated objections. However, defense...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases