1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 79 A.D.3d
  5. 79 A.D.3d 459 (2010)
 

MATTER OF FODOR v. N.Y.S. DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL

3794, 112530/08.

79 A.D.3d 459 (2010)

912 N.Y.S.2d 199

In the Matter of JOSEPH E. FODOR et al., Appellants, v. N.Y.S. DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL, Respondent, and 230 RIVERSIDE LLC, Intervenor-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 7, 2010.

DHCR's determination not to require the owner to upgrade the wiring inside each apartment is rationally based (see generally Matter of Peckham v Calogero, 12 N.Y.3d 424, 431 [2009]) on an affidavit from a licensed electrical engineer stating that every apartment would be able to utilize modern appliances after the owner's proposed improvements were implemented, and that the rewiring would benefit the tenants even without an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases