1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 78 A.D.3d
  5. 78 A.D.3d 1091 (2010)
 

ATERES HASOFRIM, INC. v. KRALIK

2009-09774.

78 A.D.3d 1091 (2010)

911 N.Y.S.2d 648

ATERES HASOFRIM, INC., Respondent, v. JAMES F. KRALIK et al., Defendants, and GALAXY ASSETS CORP., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided November 30, 2010.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

In order to vacate its default in answering the complaint, the defendant Galaxy Assets Corp. (hereinafter the appellant) was required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its failure to serve an answer and a potentially meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Forward Door of N.Y., Inc. v Forlader, 41 A.D.3d 535 [2007]; Piton v Cribb, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases