Defendants' expert relied, inter alia, on unauthenticated photographs of a circular saw as the basis for his opinion that plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of the accident. Furthermore, defendants' expert mischaracterized plaintiff's examination before trial testimony in forming his conclusions. Thus, the photographs and deposition transcripts are insufficient to establish, as a matter of law (see generally Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
GASPER v. LC MAIN, LLC
3768, 113198/07, 590384/08.
79 A.D.3d 428 (2010)
913 N.Y.S.2d 39
JORGE GASPER, Respondent, v. LC MAIN, LLC, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 2, 2010.
Decided December 2, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
