Plaintiff's contention that the motion court erred in not setting forth any analysis of the Child Support Standards Act (CSSA) factors (see Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [b] [3]; [c], [f]) to explicate its award lacks merit. Courts considering applications for pendente lite child support may, in their discretion, apply the CSSA standards and guidelines, but they are not required to do so (see George v George,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
RUBIN v. SALLA
3602N, 350047/09.
78 A.D.3d 504 (2010)
910 N.Y.S.2d 439
MARA RUBIN, Appellant, v. ANTHONY DELLA SALLA, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 16, 2010.
Decided November 16, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
