There is a conflict of interest in the Akerman firm's representation of the Andesat entities in a pending arbitration where they are the claimants, given that one of its partners, Charles Beeman, previously represented the interests of petitioner (respondent in the arbitration) in negotiating a set of agreements substantially related to the subject of the arbitration (see Kassis v Teacher's Ins. & Annuity Assn.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
STAR ONE S.A. v. ANDESAT S.A. E.M.A.
3574, 601723/09.
78 A.D.3d 460 (2010)
909 N.Y.S.2d 634
STAR ONE S.A., Appellant, v. ANDESAT S.A. E.M.A. et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 9, 2010.
Decided November 9, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
