PAEZ v. SHAH

2009-07131.

78 A.D.3d 675 (2010)

909 N.Y.S.2d 664

ERIC PAEZ, Appellant, v. HEMAL SHAH, Defendant, and SURENDRA SHAH, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided November 3, 2010.


Ordered that the order entered June 26, 2009, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Having initially failed to consider the plaintiff's opposition to the motion papers submitted by the defendant Surendra Shah (hereinafter the defendant), the Supreme Court granted reargument. Upon reargument, the Supreme Court properly adhered to its determination granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases