Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint is granted, and the plaintiff's cross motion for leave to file an amended notice of claim is denied.
It is undisputed that the plaintiff's notice of claim did not substantially comply with the requirements of General Municipal Law § 50-e (2) (see Ming v City of New York,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.