1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.3d
  4. 29 Misc.3d
  5. 29 Misc.3d 1178 (2010)
 

IN THE MATTER OF DAVID G.

46007.

29 Misc.3d 1178 (2010)

909 N.Y.S.2d 891

In the Matter of DAVID G. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. BLOSSOM B. et al., Respondents.

Family Court, Kings County.

Decided October 15, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brooklyn Family Defense Project, Brooklyn ( Tara Urs of counsel), for Blossom B., respondent.

Michael A. Cardozo , Corporation Counsel, Brooklyn ( Meredith Thomas of counsel), for New York City Children's Services.

Etta Ibok , New York City, for Omar G., respondent.

Legal Aid Society, Brooklyn ( Erin Palacios of counsel), for the children.

OPINION OF THE COURT

EMILY M. OLSHANSKY, J.

The question presented by the instant case is whether the evidence adduced on New York City Children's Service's (NYCCS) direct case at the combined Family Court Act § 1027 hearing, for the child David, and Family Court Act § 1028 hearing, for the children Javel and Blossom, establishes imminent risk sufficient to warrant the children remaining in nonkinship foster care during the pendency of these proceedings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases