1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 77 A.D.3d
  5. 77 A.D.3d 949 (2010)
 

MATTER OF MATEJKO v. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN

2010-01695.

77 A.D.3d 949 (2010)

910 N.Y.S.2d 123

In the Matter of GEORGE MATEJKO, Appellant, v. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided October 26, 2010.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Local zoning boards have broad discretion in considering applications for variances, and judicial review is limited to determining whether the action taken by the board was illegal, arbitrary, or an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Ifrah v Utschig, 98 N.Y.2d 304, 308 [2002]; Matter of Halperin v City of New Rochelle, 24 A.D.3d 768

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases