KENT v. 534 E. 11TH ST.

107528/08, 2785.

80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)

912 N.Y.S.2d 2

GILL KENT, Respondent, v. 534 EAST 11TH STREET et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 28, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

O'Connor Redd, LLP, White Plains ( John P. Grill of counsel), for appellants.

Himmelstein, McConnell, Gribben, Donoghue & Joseph, New York City ( Serge Joseph of counsel), for respondent.

ANDRIAS, J.P., RENWICK and RICHTER, JJ., concur with CATTERSON, J.; ROMÁN, J., concurs in a separate opinion.


OPINION OF THE COURT

CATTERSON, J.

This action reaches us as a result of the plaintiff's attorneys reframing their arguments in a way obviously designed to evade the statute of limitations. This does not salvage plaintiff's complaint but serves only to illustrate why the motion court should have adhered to its original ruling granting summary judgment to the defendants, and not permitted revisitation by granting plaintiff's motion for reargument.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases