1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 77 A.D.3d
  5. 77 A.D.3d 588 (2010)
 

MATTER OF LORETTA C.W. v. MARK A.W.

3493.

77 A.D.3d 588 (2010)

909 N.Y.S.2d 361

In the Matter of LORETTA C.W., Appellant, v. MARK A.W., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 28, 2010.

Petitioner's argument, that the 35-day period for filing objections under Family Court Act § 439 (e) never began running because the Family Court mailed the order of support directly to her rather than to her counsel (see CPLR 2103 [b]), is unpreserved since it was never raised before the Family Court. Were we to review this argument, we would find that in the objections to the order of support, petitioner's counsel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases