Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant's contention that he was deprived of his right to present a defense as a result of the Supreme Court's refusal to grant him a further adjournment to secure the continued testimony of a witness. Any evidence that the defendant could have elicited from that witness would have been cumulative of evidence already elicited from three other defense witnesses (see People v Jackson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.