The superceding information charging defendant with public lewdness pursuant to Penal Law § 245.00 was facially sufficient. The "public place" requirement was satisfied by allegations that adequately described the premises (an entry vestibule), defendant's conduct and the surrounding circumstances, so as to warrant the inference that defendant committed a lewd act in a place where he would likely be observed by casual passersby (see People v McNamara,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. REYNOSO
3431, 19147/05.
77 A.D.3d 528 (2010)
908 N.Y.S.2d 879
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAMON REYNOSO, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 21, 2010.
Decided October 21, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
