1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 77 A.D.3d
  5. 77 A.D.3d 518 (2010)
 

RESPONSE PERSONNEL, INC. v. ASCHENBRENNER

3419, 106509/08.

77 A.D.3d 518 (2010)

909 N.Y.S.2d 433

RESPONSE PERSONNEL, INC., Appellant, v. ERIK ASCHENBRENNER et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 21, 2010.

The court properly denied plaintiff's motion for a protective order, since plaintiff failed to show that there was anything unreasonable or improper about defendants' demands for its tax returns (see Pyfrom v Tishman Constr. Co. of N.Y., 270 A.D.2d 24 [2000]; Gitlin v Chirinkin, 71 A.D.3d 728 [2010]).

Under these circumstances, directing plaintiff to produce documents in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases