OVITZ v. BLOOMBERG L.P.

2864, 603692/08.

77 A.D.3d 515 (2010)

909 N.Y.S.2d 710

BRUCE OVITZ, Respondent, v. BLOOMBERG L.P., et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 21, 2010.


In this putative class action, accepting as true the facts alleged in the complaint (see Leon v Martinez, 84 N.Y.2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), we hold the automatic renewal provision of the agreement between plaintiff and defendants was both "inoperative" (General Obligations Law § 5-901) and "unenforceable" (§ 5-903), since defendants failed to provide the requisite notice to plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases