ACOSTA-RODRIGUEZ v. CITY OF NEW YORK

3400, 22072/01, 20295/03.

77 A.D.3d 503 (2010)

909 N.Y.S.2d 712

JOEY ACOSTA-RODRIGUEZ et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendant. MARILYN ARCE, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 21, 2010.


Plaintiffs raised no triable issues of fact to contradict the evidence submitted by defendants that the sexual abuse of the infant plaintiffs by an employee of defendant Board of Education (BOE) was not committed in furtherance of school business and was done for personal reasons. Accordingly, defendants cannot be held liable under the theory of respondeat superior (see N.X. v Cabrini Med. Ctr., 97 N...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases