Defendant dermatologist failed to establish his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action alleging medical malpractice. Defendant submitted an affidavit which stated that during his treatment of plaintiff, he did not deviate from good and accepted medical practices. However, it failed to address plaintiff's essential factual allegations, namely, whether the keloid defendant treated was or was not the same lesion that proved to be cancerous (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BREITMAN v. DENNETT
3374, 105789/07.
77 A.D.3d 498 (2010)
910 N.Y.S.2d 51
RACHEL BREITMAN, Respondent, v. JAY A. DENNETT, M.D., Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 19, 2010.
Decided October 19, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
