The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress his statements to the police. Defendant persistently questioned the officer about the charges and evidence against him. The officer's very brief responses to some of defendant's questions did not constitute the functional equivalent of interrogation requiring Miranda warnings (see People v Rivers,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. NORMAN
3373, 2236/06.
77 A.D.3d 497 (2010)
909 N.Y.S.2d 701
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BARRY NORMAN, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 19, 2010.
Decided October 19, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.