Since defendant's arguments on appeal are significantly different from those he made at trial, he has not preserved his present claims concerning the chain of custody for an altered MetroCard and the destruction of allegedly exculpatory evidence, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits. There was a proper chain of custody for the MetroCard at issue (see People v Julian,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. GREEMAN
3359, 724/07.
77 A.D.3d 481 (2010)
909 N.Y.S.2d 54
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD GREEMAN, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 14, 2010.
Decided October 14, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
