Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that he is entitled to a new trial because a witness's identification of him as the shooter was improperly bolstered by the witness's identification of uncharged accomplices is not preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). We decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]; [6] [a]).
The defendant contends that he...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.