UMEZE v. FIDELIS CARE N.Y.

2655, 25626/03

76 A.D.3d 873 (2010)

908 N.Y.S.2d 186

BEN UMEZE, M.D., Respondent, v. FIDELIS CARE NEW YORK et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided September 21, 2010.


"When served with a 90-day demand pursuant to CPLR 3216, it is incumbent upon a plaintiff to comply with the demand by filing a note of issue or by moving, before the default date, to either vacate the notice or extend the 90-day period" (Primiano v Ginsberg, 55 A.D.3d 709, 709 [2008]; see Serby v Long Is. Jewish Med. Ctr., 34 A.D.3d 441

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases