CAMPIONE v. NEW HAMPSHIRE INS. CO.

3188, 102887/07, 3188A, 590500/07, 590891/07, 104089/07, 590592/07, 590892/07, 591124/08

76 A.D.3d 484 (2010)

906 N.Y.S.2d 561

VINCENT CAMPIONE et al., Respondents, v. NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants, and MELTZER/MANDL ARCHITECTS, P.C., Appellant. (And Other Actions.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided August 24, 2010.


Given the specific facts of this case and New York's strong preference for disposing of cases on the merits, Meltzer/Mandl should have been allowed to interpose its answer (Catarine v Beth Israel Med. Ctr., 290 A.D.2d 213, 215 [2002]). Plaintiffs concede that Meltzer/Mandl complied with the discovery demands of all parties, except for answering interrogatories.

However, several of Supreme Court's compliance orders on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases