Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant's argument that he was deprived of his right to present a defense when the Supreme Court precluded certain testimony of a prospective witness. Although a defendant may not be precluded from introducing extrinsic evidence "where the issue to which the evidence relates is material" to those "issues that the jury must decide" (People v Carroll,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.