Per Curiam.
Charge I of the petition alleges that respondent filed an attorney registration statement in compliance with Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR 118.1) for the 2008-2009 biennial period accompanied by a check for the $350 registration fee which was returned for insufficient funds. Respondent has failed to correct the deficiency to date. The charge alleges a violation of former Code of Professional...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.