OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
The Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District (hereinafter the Grievance Committee) served the respondent with a petition dated September 11, 2008, containing two charges of professional misconduct. After a preliminary conference on January 26, 2009 and a hearing on April 29, 2009, the Special Referee sustained both charges "based upon technicalities," and noted that the respondent had not converted funds for his...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.