Defendant's challenges to the prosecutor's summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the remarks at issue were permissible responses to the defense summation, and that nothing in the summation deprived defendant of a fair trial (see People v Overlee,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. UNDERWOOD
3216, 3081/07.
75 A.D.3d 430 (2010)
903 N.Y.S.2d 229
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TERRANCE UNDERWOOD, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided July 1, 2010.
Decided July 1, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.